مجله رویش روانشناسی از دادن گواهیهای کاغذی معذور است. لطفا تقاضا نکنید. همه گواهی ها در صفحه شخصی کاربران موجود است.
Search published articles
Showing 2 results for Hosseini Ravarizadeh
Narmin Bromand, Narges Hosseini Ravarizadeh,
year 12, Issue 1 (Spring 2023 2023)
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of short-term dynamic psychotherapy and thematic relationships on interpersonal sensitivity and aggressive behaviors in individuals with a borderline personality disorder. The research design was a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test with a control group. The statistical population of the present study was all people with borderline personality disorder admitted to Razi Hospital in Urmia in 1399. Forty-five women were selected by purposive sampling method based on entry and exit criteria and in two experimental groups (each (15 patients) and the group waiting for treatment was randomly replaced. So that the first experimental group did not receive short-term dynamic psychotherapy, the second experimental group did not receive thematic relationships and the waiting group did not receive any intervention. The Bartes Impulsivity Scale (BIS, Bart, 1997) and the Interpersonal Sensitivity Questionnaire (ISS, Boyce and Popker, 1989) were used to collect data. Data were analyzed by multivariate analysis of covariance and post hoc test. The results showed that short-term dynamic psychotherapy and thematic relationships have an effect on interpersonal sensitivity and aggressive behaviors in people with borderline personality disorder (P <0.01). The results of the post hoc test also showed that short-term dynamic psychotherapy has a greater effect on aggressive behaviors and the treatment of thematic relationships has an effect on interpersonal sensitivity in borderline disorders (P <0.05). According to the therapeutic goals, dynamic psychotherapy and thematic relationships can be used to influence interpersonal sensitivity and aggressive behavior.
Narges Hosseini Ravarizadeh, Ghasem Naziryy, Azam Davoodi, Najmeh Fath,
year 12, Issue 2 (spring 2023 2023)
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of transactional analysis on relationship attributions, cognitive regulation strategies of emotion, and differentiation of incompatible couples. The research design was a quasi-experimental pre-test and post-test with a control group. The statistical population was the incompatible couples who were referred to counseling centers in Jiroft city in 2022, and 40 couples were selected from this population by purposeful sampling, and 20 couples were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. To collect data, the self-differentiation questionnaire (DSI-R) (Skorn and Friedlander, 2003), the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies Scale (CERQ) (Garnefsky et al., 2002), and the Relationship Attributions Questionnaire (CDQ) (Bradbury and Fincham, 1992) were used. Data analysis was done by multivariate covariance analysis. The results showed that by controlling the effect of the pre-test, there is a significant difference between the mean of relationship attributions, cognitive regulation strategies of emotion, and differentiation of couples in the post-test of the experimental and control groups at the level of P<0.01. Paying attention to the transactional analysis has an important role in differentiation, relationship attributions, and cognitive regulation strategies of emotion and it is suggested to intervene for incompatible couples.