Write your message
year 7, Issue 4 (Summer2018 2018)                   frooyesh 2018, 7(4): 181-194 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

bahrami ehsan H, Rouhani Z S. psychology in ambiguity of its definition. frooyesh. 2018; 7 (4) :181-194
URL: http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-1202-en.html
1- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. , hbahrami@ut.ac.ir
2- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (1262 Views)
While psychologists do train, research, even practice clinical interventions, without any doubt about the subject of their study and science, they still obscure the issue of psychology, the "psychic" concept. Although passing at least one century since the recognition of the science of psychology and the extraordinary development of branches and different psychological trends, there is still no consensus about this issue. Psyche, mind, behavior, and psychological processes have been interpreted in the history of human knowledge since the beginning of its production and at least its registration has been used up to now. This paper, with its focus on the dissection of the subject of psychology in the history of science, seeks to review this ambiguity and to show the dominance of this ambiguity in the present situation.
Key Concepts: psyche, Mind, Spirit, Subject of Psychology
Full-Text [PDF 517 kb]   (26 Downloads)    
Type of Article: Analysis | Subject: General Psychology
Received: 2018/05/26 | Revised: 2019/10/10 | Accepted: 2018/06/19 | ePublished: 2018/07/14

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Rooyesh-e- Ravanshenasi Journal(RRJ)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb