مجله رویش روا‌ن‌شناسی از دادن گواهی‌های کاغذی معذور است. لطفا تقاضا نکنید. همه گواهی ها در صفحه شخصی کاربران موجود است.

year 14, Issue 4 (sumer 2025 2025)                   Rooyesh 2025, 14(4): 201-210 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.SARI.REC.1403.049

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khaleghzadeh Rostami M, Noruzi A, Hosseini S H. (2025). Comparing the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Logotherapy Based on Rumi's Thoughts on Psychological Hardiness in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis. Rooyesh. 14(4), 201-210.
URL: http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-6256-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Sar.c., Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran.
2- Assistant professor, Department of Psychology, Sar.c., Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran. , 2091474029@iau.ir
3- Psychosomatic Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Abstract:   (20 Views)
The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and logotherapy based on Rumi's thoughts (LBRT) on psychological hardiness in patients undergoing hemodialysis. The present study was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test design and a control group with a follow-up period of 45 days. The statistical population of this study included all renal patients requiring hemodialysis services in Sari in 2024. 45 people were selected using the convenience sampling method and randomly assigned to three groups: experiment 1 (15 people), experiment 2 (15 people), and control (15 people). The Ahvaz Psychological Hardiness Inventory (AHI; Kiamarsi et al., 1999) was used to collect data. ACT, based on the Hayes and Strossall model and logotherapy, based on Rumi's thoughts, based on the model of Noruzi et al., were implemented in 8 sessions for the intervention groups as a group. Data analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The findings showed that compared to the control group, the two interventions, ACT and LBRT, were effective in increasing psychological hardiness until the follow-up stage (P<0.05). The findings also showed that there was a significant difference between the two therapeutic interventions; in fact, the effect of LBRT on psychological hardiness was greater (P<0.05). Overall, it can be concluded that LBRT had a greater effect on psychological hardiness in hemodialysis patients than ACT.
Full-Text [PDF 495 kb]   (14 Downloads)    
Type of Article: Research | Subject: Health
Received: 2025/05/7 | Accepted: 2025/05/22 | ePublished: 2025/07/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal(RRJ)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb