مجله رویش روا‌ن‌شناسی از دادن گواهی‌های کاغذی معذور است. لطفا تقاضا نکنید. همه گواهی ها در صفحه شخصی کاربران موجود است.

year 8, Issue 3 (Sprig 2019 2019)                   Rooyesh 2019, 8(3): 147-156 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khodabandelow S, Rahimian Boogar I, Najafi M. (2019). Narcissistic personality disorder in DSM-5 Section II and Section III: The study of alternative model. Rooyesh. 8(3), 147-156.
URL: http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-1023-en.html
1- M. A. in Clinical Psychology, University of Semnan , saeed_kh305@yahoo.com
2- PhD in Health Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Semnan University
3- PhD in Clinical Psychology, Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Semnan University
Abstract:   (3696 Views)
Abstract
Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration and lack of empathy that people because of belief to being special and unique, interpersonal problems and empathy are faced.
The present paper is studying the conceptualization and diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder in DSM-5 main Section (Section II) and Alternative model (Section III) and tried to base on five components including in nature (healthy, pathological), phenotype (grandiosity, vulnerability), expression (overt, covert), structure (category, dimension), comorbidity, validity, and clinical benefit was compared the NPD in two DSM-5 sections. The conceptualization and diagnosis of NPD in DSM-5 Section II, has weaknesses and limitations such as; the lack of attention to the natural and pathological nature of narcissism, the emphasis on the grandiosity phenotype of this structure and the disregard of its vulnerability, Neglecting overt and covert expressions of clinical symptoms, the categorical approach to diagnosis, the defect in specify this disorder of other personality disorders and the underestimate of prevalence rate. In contrast, the alternative model in section III has a more comprehensive theoretical, dimensional, and diagnostic conceptualization than the central part, and provides appropriate criteria consider to the function and personality pathology in A and B criteria and has better diagnostic benefits. The alternative model in DSM-5 Section III seems to be a suitable substitute for diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder in the later versions of DSM, after gaining the validity and integrity with experiences of clinical experts and with care in various types and dimensions of narcissism, can be effective on the diagnostic challenges of clinicians.
Full-Text [PDF 990 kb]   (60 Downloads)    
Type of Article: Analysis |
Received: 2017/12/28 | Accepted: 2018/01/21 | ePublished: 2019/06/15

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal(RRJ)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb